Remembering John W. Creasy, Deceased December 16, 2003

When and How Did John W. Creasy Pass Away? A Look at the Date of Death.

The date December 16, 2003, marks the passing of John W. Creasy. This date serves as a pivotal point in the historical record, marking the end of a life. Acknowledging this date provides insight into the chronological sequence of events and contributes to a complete biographical portrait.

The significance of this date lies in its historical context. It represents a specific moment in time, important for those who knew John W. Creasy and for those who wish to understand the full scope of his life and career. Knowing this date adds context and detail to any biography or historical record pertaining to Mr. Creasy. Further, the date helps to establish a timeline in relation to other important events of the period. Understanding this date aids in the organization of information and in forming a holistic understanding of individuals and their contributions.

This date of death, while providing crucial information, is just one piece of the puzzle. To gain a full understanding of John W. Creasy's life and impact, further research into his personal and professional life is recommended. This may include exploring his career, contributions, and the context surrounding his passing.

John W. Creasy Died December 16, 2003

Understanding the date of John W. Creasy's passing provides a critical piece of biographical context. This date, along with other details, helps to contextualize his life and work.

• Date of death
• Biographical marker
• Historical context
• Time of life's end
• Personal remembrance
• Chronological placement
• Contribution to history
• Life impact

The date December 16, 2003, functions as a significant marker in John W. Creasy's biography. It defines a crucial point in time. The "historical context" aspect situates his death within the broader scope of events during that period. His "life impact" and contributions are contextualized within his lifetime. "Chronological placement" clarifies his role in the timeline of history. Remembering the specific "date of death" is pivotal in understanding the continuity of human history. The "biographical marker" pinpoints a specific point in a person's life, thus providing a strong connection to other historical events of the same year or time period. This memorializes John W. Creasy's legacy and significance in his community.

1. Date of death

The phrase "John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003" establishes a crucial biographical detail: the date of death. This date anchors the event within a specific point in time, connecting it to other events and contexts. The date is an essential component of the statement, providing a fixed point for understanding the timeline of John W. Creasy's life. Without this date, the significance of the event would be diminished, lacking a crucial anchor in the historical record. Such anchoring allows for comparisons and analyses across timelines.

In practical applications, understanding the date of death is vital for various reasons. For example, researchers studying historical trends might use such data to analyze mortality rates, societal shifts, or other contextual factors. Biographers and genealogists utilize precise dates of birth and death to construct accurate timelines and family trees. This understanding is also critical in legal or administrative contexts, particularly for inheritance or estate proceedings. Furthermore, the date provides a touchstone for remembering and honoring individuals, offering a basis for commemorating their lives.

In summary, the date of death, as exemplified by "John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003," is a fundamental element for accurate biographical representation and historical record-keeping. Its precision allows for contextualization and analysis, crucial for understanding individual lives and historical developments. The precise date is critical for accurate record-keeping in diverse fields, from biography and genealogy to historical research and legal proceedings. This seemingly simple detail plays a significant role in shaping our understanding of the past and connecting it to the present.

2. Biographical Marker

The phrase "John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003" serves as a fundamental biographical marker. This specific date anchors a life event within a precise timeframe, placing it within a larger historical context. A biographical marker, in this case, is a definitive point in a person's life that signifies a significant change, often a crucial turning point or a noteworthy occurrence.

• Chronological Anchoring
  

  A biographical marker like the date of death provides a clear chronological reference point. This allows for the placement of the individual's life within a broader historical timeline, facilitating comparisons and analysis. The date "December 16, 2003" in relation to John W. Creasy situates his life's end within a particular year, providing a concrete benchmark for historical context.

• Defining a Turning Point
  

  The death of an individual marks a significant turning point, altering the course of lives intertwined with that person. The date "December 16, 2003" acts as a demarcation line in the histories of those who knew and interacted with John W. Creasy. This point in time represents a fundamental shift in their collective narratives.

• Facilitating Research and Analysis
  

  Biographical markers such as death dates are essential components for historical research. They allow researchers to narrow their scope, pinpoint specific periods, and develop a more precise understanding of individuals within their historical contexts. The specificity of "December 16, 2003" allows for deeper investigation into the surrounding circumstances, potentially illuminating socioeconomic, cultural, or personal factors relevant to John W. Creasy's life.

• Memorialization and Remembrance
  

  Biographical markers, including dates of death, often become focal points for memorialization. The date "December 16, 2003" associated with John W. Creasy provides a crucial date for remembrance, providing a concrete reference for those wishing to honor and acknowledge his life. These markers help solidify the memory of individuals within collective memory.

In conclusion, the date "December 16, 2003" serves as a key biographical marker, providing a definitive point in John W. Creasy's life. This date anchors his life within the flow of history and facilitates research, analysis, and remembrance. Further analysis may reveal how the events leading up to and following this date shaped and influenced the life of John W. Creasy and those around him.

3. Historical Context

Understanding the historical context surrounding the death of John W. Creasy on December 16, 2003, is essential for a complete understanding of the event. This context provides a framework for interpreting the significance of the date and situating it within broader societal, cultural, or political trends. The surrounding circumstances can illuminate motivations, impacts, and the broader environment in which this event occurred.

• Socioeconomic Conditions
  

  The economic climate in 2003, including prevailing unemployment rates, inflation, and significant market trends, might have influenced Mr. Creasy's life and experiences. Understanding these conditions can shed light on the broader context of his death. Factors like economic hardship or prosperity, prevalent social issues, or significant political movements could potentially play a role.

• Technological Advancements
  

  Technological developments in 2003 might have influenced Mr. Creasy's life or work. The presence or absence of specific technologies could have altered his career path, communication styles, or access to information. Examining these advancements provides a broader understanding of his environment.

• Cultural and Political Events
  

  Significant cultural or political events unfolding in 2003 might have had a bearing on John W. Creasy's life or personal views. These events might have presented opportunities or challenges. For example, major elections, social movements, or international crises could influence the context surrounding the event.

• Medical and Scientific Advancements
  

  The state of medical and scientific knowledge in 2003 is relevant. Advances in healthcare, diagnoses, or treatments could have had a direct or indirect bearing on Mr. Creasy's life or the circumstances surrounding his passing. Evaluating these aspects might provide a better understanding of the prevailing conditions related to healthcare.

By examining the historical context, a richer understanding of John W. Creasy's death on December 16, 2003, is possible. Factors such as socioeconomic conditions, technological advancements, cultural and political events, and scientific understanding contribute to a more complete picture. Without this broader context, the event remains an isolated moment in time. Additional research into these aspects would further elucidate the background of this individual's life and demise.

4. Time of life's end

The phrase "John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003" immediately establishes a specific time of life's end. This date serves as a crucial marker, anchoring the event within a particular moment in history. Understanding the "time of life's end" is vital for comprehending the context, implications, and significance of this event. This exploration examines how this date functions within a broader biographical and historical framework.

• Chronological Positioning
  

  The date, December 16, 2003, locates John W. Creasy's passing within a specific period. This positioning allows for comparisons with other events, trends, or conditions prevalent during that time. It creates a specific point of reference for analysis, enabling researchers to examine related historical events or personal circumstances around that date. The understanding of this date within the context of John W. Creasy's life provides a framework for appreciating the sequence and progression of events during his life.

• Contextualization of Events
  

  The "time of life's end" clarifies the broader context in which John W. Creasy's life concluded. Understanding the circumstances surrounding this date, including relevant social, political, or economic conditions, provides insight into potential influences or factors that may have contributed to or been affected by the event. The specific moment becomes more significant when placed within this broader narrative. It allows analysis of contemporaneous factors affecting society, and their possible impact on the deceased's life.

• Impact on Legacy and Remembrance
  

  The time of life's end shapes how the individual's legacy is perceived and remembered. The specific date connects the person to the historical period, potentially influencing the manner in which their achievements or contributions are viewed. This influences how posterity reflects on and assesses the contributions of the individual and their place within a specific period.

• Facilitating Analysis and Research
  

  A precise time of deathDecember 16, 2003, in this instanceallows for structured research and analysis. Researchers can examine related occurrences or conditions during this period, potentially enabling comparisons and broader analyses of trends or patterns related to mortality. The specific date enables the study of trends and context relevant to the particular individual and the time period.

In conclusion, the "time of life's end," represented by December 16, 2003, in the context of John W. Creasy's death, is not simply a date. It is a critical element for analyzing and understanding the individual's life and the historical period in which it occurred. Precise temporal placement allows for contextualization, impacting research, remembrance, and overall understanding of the individual and the historical period.

5. Personal Remembrance

The phrase "John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003" triggers personal remembrance, a fundamental human response to loss. This remembrance, often focused on the individual's life, character, and contributions, provides context and significance beyond the simple fact of death. The date itself becomes a point of connection and reflection for those who knew and were affected by Mr. Creasy.

• Shared Memories and Experiences
  

  Personal remembrance often involves recollections of shared memories and experiences with the deceased. These might include anecdotes, inside jokes, shared activities, or observed qualities. For those who knew John W. Creasy, memories on December 16, 2003, may center on their interactions with him. These recollections might illuminate facets of his personality and influence on others' lives.

• Emotional Responses and Reactions
  

  Personal remembrance encompasses emotional responses and reactions, extending beyond mere factual recollection. Feelings of grief, sadness, or nostalgia, triggered by the date December 16, 2003, might be deeply intertwined with personal recollections of John W. Creasy. These responses, though subjective, contribute to a richer understanding of the individual and their impact. The date serves as a trigger for personal reflections on emotions associated with loss and remembrance.

• Contribution to Collective Memory
  

  Personal remembrance, while specific to individuals' experiences, contributes to a collective memory. As time progresses, the shared memories and emotions surrounding the date December 16, 2003, associated with John W. Creasy, could become part of a broader community's or family's shared narrative. These narratives, pieced together over time, shape the collective understanding of the individual and their significance within a community.

• Reflection on Life's Journey
  

  Personal remembrance can function as a reflection on life's journey, prompting contemplation on the brevity of life and the value of time. This reflection might be more pronounced when connected to a specific date, such as December 16, 2003. The passing of John W. Creasy and the associated date can encourage contemplation of mortality, the importance of connections, and the lasting impact of individuals.

Ultimately, personal remembrance, fueled by the date December 16, 2003, in the context of John W. Creasy's death, acts as a powerful reminder of human connection and the enduring impact of individuals on others' lives. These facets of remembrance, while subjective, collectively enrich the understanding of the individual's life and legacy.

6. Chronological placement

The phrase "John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003" inherently necessitates chronological placement. This date situates the event within a specific point on the timeline of history. Without this precise placement, the event loses context, becoming an isolated data point rather than a meaningful historical marker. Understanding the precise date allows for comparisons with other events occurring during that year and decade, thus enriching the understanding of the broader historical moment.

Chronological placement, in this case, is a critical component of understanding the circumstances surrounding the death. It allows researchers and individuals to consider societal trends, economic conditions, technological advancements, and political climate at that particular moment in time. For instance, examining the economic state of the country in 2003 is relevant to understanding potential factors that may have contributed to or been influenced by Mr. Creasy's passing. Similarly, examining the state of medical science at the time could illuminate factors influencing the circumstances surrounding the death. The precise date becomes a crucial anchor for more nuanced historical analysis. Examples of this practical significance include historical research on mortality rates, societal shifts, and economic trends.

In conclusion, the chronological placement inherent in "John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003" is fundamental. It provides a critical reference point for research, analysis, and understanding of the broader historical context. Precise dating anchors events within a larger framework, highlighting interconnectedness and relationships between events, conditions, and individuals within a given period. The importance of this temporal placement extends beyond simple record-keeping, offering a lens through which to analyze and interpret the broader historical environment in which the event occurred. By establishing a precise time of death, a clearer and more comprehensive understanding is achieved.

7. Contribution to History

The statement "John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003" establishes a chronological marker, but it does not inherently define a contribution to history. A contribution to history requires more than a date of death; it necessitates an action, impact, or legacy that extends beyond the individual's immediate sphere. The death itself, while a significant event in a personal narrative, does not inherently represent a contribution to the broader historical record unless the circumstances surrounding the death were pivotal or reflected a substantial trend. For instance, if John W. Creasy had held a prominent position and his death triggered a significant change in policy or prompted public discourse, this could be considered a contribution to history. Otherwise, the date of death alone is not a contribution to history.

The connection between a contribution to history and the date of death hinges on the broader impact of the individual's life or the circumstances surrounding the event. A contribution might manifest through groundbreaking research, innovative practices, transformative social movements, or extraordinary acts of service during the lifetime of the individual. The date, December 16, 2003, simply marks the end of one life. It is the content of that life, the impact it had, and the lasting consequences that determine its contribution to history. To explore this connection meaningfully, further analysis would need to consider the specifics of John W. Creasy's life, work, and the context of his death.

In summary, while the date "December 16, 2003" is a crucial chronological element in understanding John W. Creasy's life, it does not inherently equate to a contribution to history. A contribution arises from actions, achievements, or legacies that have demonstrable influence on the historical trajectory. To connect the death to historical contributions, one must delve beyond the mere date of death into the substance of John W. Creasy's life and the impact of that life on his surroundings. Without such further context, the statement is a biographical detail, not a historical contribution.

8. Life Impact

"John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003" establishes a point in time, the cessation of a life. Life impact, however, extends beyond a single date. It encompasses the totality of a lifethe accumulated actions, influences, and consequences that resonate within a person's community and beyond. The date of death serves as a punctuation mark in the narrative of a life, but the impact extends across the span of that life. The concept of life impact is crucial in understanding the enduring significance of John W. Creasy's existence.

To connect "life impact" with the date of death, one must analyze the individual's contributions during their lifetime. Did John W. Creasy hold a position of influence? Did he participate in activities that fostered community growth, or lead initiatives that had lasting effects? Did he mentor others, inspire innovation, or serve a cause that fostered positive change? The specific impacts are critical, as is their scale. A teacher's influence on countless students or a scientist's discoveries can have a profound impact, reaching far beyond their immediate circle. Conversely, a life devoid of significant contributions may not have a measurable impact outside immediate family and friends. Understanding the specifics of John W. Creasy's life and activities is necessary for assessing his impact.

Examining the life impact of John W. Creasy, as it relates to the date of death, requires an exploration of context. This includes considering the societal, cultural, and economic conditions during his life, the broader impact of these events, and how his life might have been shaped or influenced by these factors. If his actions or contributions coincided with significant periods of societal change or development, then a clear connection emerges between his life and the broader historical context. Analyzing the specific impact, be it through direct or indirect contributions, within the broader historical context is vital. This analysis goes beyond simply recording a date; it seeks to understand how that life unfolded and how it interacted with the world around him. Ultimately, the significance of "life impact" underscores the need to analyze the life that predated "John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003," not merely the termination of it.

Frequently Asked Questions about John W. Creasy's Death on December 16, 2003

This section addresses common inquiries regarding the death of John W. Creasy on December 16, 2003. Accurate information and context are presented to clarify any misconceptions surrounding this event.

Question 1: What was the significance of John W. Creasy's death on December 16, 2003?

Answer 1: The significance lies in the specific date marking the end of a life. This date is a component of historical record-keeping, crucial for biographical representation and placing the event within the broader context of the period. While the death itself is a significant personal event, its historical weight depends on the circumstances and impact of Creasy's life and the broader context surrounding his passing.

Question 2: What role does the date December 16, 2003, play in understanding John W. Creasy's life?

Answer 2: The date serves as a chronological marker, anchoring Creasy's life within a specific period. This positioning allows for comparisons with other events, trends, or conditions prevalent during that time, potentially illuminating socioeconomic, cultural, or political factors that may have influenced his life.

Question 3: Did John W. Creasy's death contribute to history?

Answer 3: A contribution to history requires more than a date of death. Significant contributions stem from actions, achievements, or legacies that demonstrably influence the historical trajectory. The death itself does not automatically qualify as a historical contribution. Whether Creasy's death had wider historical significance would depend on the surrounding circumstances and the context of his life and work.

Question 4: How does the date help researchers studying the period surrounding December 16, 2003?

Answer 4: The date provides a precise reference point for research, allowing for analysis of related occurrences or conditions during that time. Researchers can utilize the date to investigate trends, patterns, or events occurring around the death, such as social or economic contexts, healthcare, or political landscape during that period.

Question 5: How can individuals remember John W. Creasy in relation to this date?

Answer 5: Personal remembrance can be focused on the individual's life, personality, contributions, or the impact they had on others. The date becomes a focal point for reflection and remembrance for those who knew or were affected by Creasy. Memories, emotions, and insights related to the individual can be shared or memorialized around this date.

In conclusion, understanding the date of John W. Creasy's death, December 16, 2003, requires placing it within a broader context. It's a biographical detail, but its significance hinges on the circumstances surrounding the event and the context of his life and work. Further research into these aspects is crucial to a thorough comprehension.

This concludes the FAQ section. The following section will delve deeper into [mention the next topic, e.g., John W. Creasy's career].

Conclusion

The phrase "John W. Creasy died December 16, 2003" serves as a foundational element in comprehending biographical context and historical record-keeping. This date anchors an individual's life within a specific period, allowing for contextualization and analysis. The exploration of this date illuminated the significance of precise chronological placement, the role of biographical markers, the influence of historical context, and the multifaceted nature of personal remembrance. Analysis revealed how this date functions as a reference point for understanding the individual's life and the period in which it occurred. Furthermore, the investigation underscored the distinction between a date of death and a contribution to history, emphasizing the importance of considering the totality of an individual's life and actions to fully assess their historical impact.

The concluding analysis underscores the profound need for careful consideration of context when examining historical events. To move beyond a simple date, one must delve into the nuances of the surrounding historical period, encompassing socioeconomic trends, technological advancements, cultural shifts, and political climates. This exploration, focused on John W. Creasy's death, offers a crucial framework for understanding how biographical details can be examined in relation to wider historical contexts. Further research into the specifics of Mr. Creasy's life and the period surrounding his death is encouraged to reveal the complete picture and the enduring impact of such lives on their communities. A complete understanding requires considering the full spectrum of the individual's contributions and their influence on the broader historical trajectory.